testing the security provided by hosting companies

Testing the Security Provided by Hosting Companies

Oliver Sild @ patchstack.com • 2 weeks ago

The Patchstack team challenges the notion that your web host provides sufficient site security. They setup sites with known vulnerabilities on a number of hosting platforms to see how well their security profile is. It is an interesting and useful test, and they name plugins that had vulnerabilities, but the report would have been twice as useful if they listed the names of the hosting companies. They establish a general presumption that a hosting company’s security is not sufficient, but no one knows if their hosting company was one of the ones tested, and hence “maybe” their host is better or not.

need new security architecture

Need to Adjust Security Architecture

Thomas Raef @ wewatchyourwebsite.com • 3 weeks ago

Recent data on Fail2ban and Imunify360 call into question their effectiveness in fighting modern bot attacks. These 2 tools have been widely popular for a long time, and quite effective in the past. Unfortunately, the changing nature of bot attacks and increases in number of IPs they have available (some of the bot networks now have millions of IPs). These tools just aren’t designed to handle these changing conditions.